Immigrants from Laos Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Immigrants from Laos Single Mother Poverty
30.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,327,498 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 30.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (30.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (30.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (30.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Portugal (30.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and French (30.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 3.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 3.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Welsh | 3.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Slovaks | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 2.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Salvadorans | 1.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 1.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Bermudans | 1.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 30.6% |
| French | 1.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Barbadians | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 30.8% |
| West Indians | 0.9 /100 | #247 | Tragic 30.8% |
| French Canadians | 0.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 30.8% |
Immigrants from Laos Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 12.7% |
| Maximum | 11.6% | 59.2% |
| Range | 11.5% | 46.5% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 33.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 28.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 38.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 9.7% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 129,445,456 | 29.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 29,679,300 | 27.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,606,938 | 27.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 6,961,769 | 28.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,063,155 | 31.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,689,898 | 27.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,652,362 | 30.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,233,348 | 29.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,251,928 | 27.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 784,444 | 31.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 435,718 | 29.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,181,986 | 28.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 522,559 | 36.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 360,721 | 29.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,101,911 | 37.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 107,002 | 28.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 27.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 173,826 | 46.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 173,696 | 31.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 134,992 | 30.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 249,401 | 29.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 55,237 | 36.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 67,210 | 35.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 66,685 | 40.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 72,249 | 36.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 29.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 50,995 | 52.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 37.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 55,562 | 29.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 76,140 | 32.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 8,566 | 55.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 45.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 32 | 33.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,651 | 41.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 3,841 | 35.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 30.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 44.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 789 | 48.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 29.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 140,402 | 30.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 23.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 15.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 21.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,003 | 41.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 2,595 | 38.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 4,332 | 12.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 5,291 | 59.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 15.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 37.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 41.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 2,819 | 24.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 50.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 38.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 24.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 50.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 36.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 14.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 527 | 40.0% |