Chickasaw vs Cherokee Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cherokee
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Cherokee
34.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.5%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,526,184 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 34.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 479,873,905 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 34.5%, a difference of 0.30%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Minimum | 21.2% | 12.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 78.7% | 87.3% |
Mean | 47.2% | 49.7% |
Median | 39.6% | 44.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.3% | 37.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 54.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 20.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cherokee by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Central American Indian (34.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Alsatian (34.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras (34.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Central American Indian (34.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 33.8% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 33.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 34.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 34.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 34.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 34.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |