Cajun Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Cajun
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Cajun Single Mother Poverty
40.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,029,233 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 40.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.5% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cajuns and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cajuns influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Cajuns simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Navajo (40.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Colville (39.3%, a difference of 2.7%), Sioux (38.8%, a difference of 4.0%), Crow (38.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and Pima (38.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 40.2% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 44.5% |
Cajun Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.029% | 7.8% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.4% | 92.2% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 52.5% |
| Median | 4.9% | 52.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 63.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 24.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 19.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 19.3% |
Correlation Details
| Cajun Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.029% | 130,187,581 | 31.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 8,622,205 | 30.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 3,271,914 | 33.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,205,386 | 41.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 782,905 | 31.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 677,798 | 39.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 487,108 | 39.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 365,142 | 31.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 326,553 | 46.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 153,348 | 44.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 138,380 | 35.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 162,775 | 36.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 121,133 | 45.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 77,366 | 56.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 148,143 | 58.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 170,690 | 43.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 131,039 | 44.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 46,990 | 39.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 70,674 | 42.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 75,079 | 51.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 115,162 | 40.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 51,523 | 52.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 5,440 | 70.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 38,497 | 43.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 99,888 | 56.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 110,440 | 55.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 57,173 | 53.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 538 | 69.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 4,800 | 36.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 16,526 | 51.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 29,975 | 65.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 6,498 | 42.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 27,050 | 65.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 1,347 | 65.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 11,006 | 46.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 6,507 | 45.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 19,497 | 53.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 8,745 | 16.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.38% | 2,231 | 36.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 4,162 | 54.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 6,659 | 63.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 7,606 | 33.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.03% | 9,639 | 73.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 5,842 | 42.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 16,937 | 65.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.90% | 9,823 | 59.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 11,726 | 71.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 30,530 | 67.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.47% | 5,579 | 79.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,584 | 82.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.05% | 3,069 | 22.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.32% | 2,633 | 10.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.50% | 13,329 | 56.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60% | 477 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 885 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 915 | 74.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.43% | 23,891 | 47.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.64% | 1,473 | 50.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 1,445 | 72.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.18% | 855 | 61.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 1,518 | 60.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.69% | 8,271 | 33.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 1,223 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.06% | 5,423 | 54.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.01% | 2,215 | 7.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.55% | 1,147 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.06% | 9,326 | 59.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.92% | 1,220 | 57.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.57% | 3,338 | 57.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.47% | 1,441 | 63.8% |