Chickasaw vs Australian Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Australian
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Australians
34.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.3%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Australian Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,526,184 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 34.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,322,695 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.739 and weighted average of 28.3%, a difference of 21.7%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Australian |
| Minimum | 21.2% | 14.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 78.7% | 85.5% |
| Mean | 47.2% | 41.8% |
| Median | 39.6% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.3% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 48.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 20.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 23.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 23.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Mother Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Central American Indian (34.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Cherokee (34.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 33.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 34.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 34.2% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uganda (28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (28.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (28.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (28.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Croatians | 94.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Venezuelans | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.7 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 92.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Australians | 92.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Brazilians | 92.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 92.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Cypriots | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Colombians | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Uruguayans | 91.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 91.7 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 28.3% |