Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
72.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,956,676 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 72.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 14.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 89.0% |
| Range | 60.0% | 57.9% |
| Mean | 75.6% | 66.3% |
| Median | 77.1% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.8% | 60.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.2% | 75.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.4% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Spanish American Indian (71.2%, a difference of 1.8%), Tongan (69.6%, a difference of 4.0%), Yakama (69.3%, a difference of 4.5%), Yuman (69.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and Immigrants from Mexico (69.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Yup'ik | 100 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 72.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 71.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 69.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.3% |
| Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 69.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 69.1% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |