Malaysian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Malaysian
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Malaysians
Celtics
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,243,890 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 4.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.81% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 70.9% |
Range | 59.2% | 67.6% |
Mean | 21.1% | 25.7% |
Median | 18.5% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants (17.7%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |