Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,310,873 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 30.5 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $43,852, a difference of 17.1%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $54,695, a difference of 15.8%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $103,534, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $56,384, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $61,988, a difference of 6.6%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $39,871, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.31, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.55%), female disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%).