Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,543,822 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to a decrease of 63.2 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $43,852, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $54,695, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($120,445 compared to $103,534, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $56,384, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $39,871, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($98,510 compared to $89,010, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.37%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 58.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.71%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.8%).