U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,462,776 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $103,173, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($71,853 compared to $89,010, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $97,329, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $39,871, a difference of 9.5%), median earnings ($41,448 compared to $47,025, a difference of 13.5%), and median male earnings ($47,066 compared to $54,695, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.4%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.57%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.1%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%).