Chinese vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chinese
Celtics
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
40.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,451,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 40.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.70% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 53.6% |
Range | 57.6% | 51.4% |
Mean | 14.1% | 23.0% |
Median | 10.7% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (16.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (16.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 37.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.7% |
Arabs | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |