Immigrants from Jamaica vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,410,924 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.4%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $35,930, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $48,643, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $86,764, a difference of 0.31%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $82,355, a difference of 1.1%), and median male earnings ($48,040 compared to $47,433, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.5%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father poverty (17.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.39%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.5%).