Slavic Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Slavic
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Slavic Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
9.8%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,346,307 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147 and weighted average of 9.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Slavs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Slavs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Slavs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Filipino (9.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Carpatho Rusyn (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Afghan (9.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from England (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants from Taiwan | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.7% |
French | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Hungarians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Filipinos | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Slavs | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Afghans | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from England | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Bolivians | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Serbians | 99.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Canada | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Celtics | 99.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Slavic Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
Minimum | 0.050% | 0.12% |
Maximum | 32.5% | 40.6% |
Range | 32.4% | 40.4% |
Mean | 5.0% | 11.9% |
Median | 3.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 9.5% |
Correlation Details
Slavic Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.050% | 240,895,406 | 10.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 19,730,087 | 8.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 5,244,175 | 8.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 1,892,867 | 10.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,055,463 | 9.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 499,716 | 8.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 277,524 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 246,858 | 9.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 123,962 | 7.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 128,423 | 5.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 41,420 | 8.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 44,407 | 6.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 35,447 | 9.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 17,426 | 12.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 36,100 | 5.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 5,525 | 13.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 5,633 | 5.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 23,398 | 7.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.05% | 3,539 | 5.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 12,305 | 4.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 2,686 | 15.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 2,463 | 6.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 3,184 | 9.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 2,520 | 9.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.02% | 722 | 37.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 290 | 14.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 2,910 | 0.12% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 409 | 9.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 2,194 | 6.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 970 | 3.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 2,536 | 4.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 420 | 40.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 595 | 12.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 598 | 8.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.00% | 150 | 2.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 132 | 12.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 223 | 5.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 150 | 24.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61% | 197 | 14.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 951 | 16.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.48% | 306 | 27.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85% | 132 | 39.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.14% | 365 | 34.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 398 | 8.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.49% | 703 | 14.3% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.46% | 422 | 3.4% |