Sioux Single Father Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,784,577 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449 and weighted average of 23.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.45% in poverty level among single fathers.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sioux and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sioux influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Sioux simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Sioux by Single Father Poverty

In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Arapaho (24.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Apache (24.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Cajun (23.1%, a difference of 3.5%), Shoshone (22.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and Kiowa (22.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Father Poverty
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 21.6%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 21.7%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 22.0%
Natives/Alaskans	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 22.4%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 22.5%
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 22.9%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 23.1%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 23.9%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 24.0%
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 24.2%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 26.7%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 27.2%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 28.4%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 28.5%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 29.2%

Sioux Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sioux Data	Single Father Poverty Data
Minimum	0.064%	6.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	99.9%	93.6%
Mean	43.4%	49.3%
Median	35.5%	40.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.3%	19.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	76.8%	79.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	65.5%	59.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	33.3%	33.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	33.1%	33.1%

Correlation Details

Sioux Percentile	Sample Size	Single Father Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.064%	195,251,935	15.1%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67%	2,710,713	17.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23%	496,200	29.9%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67%	226,119	17.3%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16%	439,999	10.3%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74%	66,565	24.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30%	97,632	23.3%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64%	37,272	21.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	53,082	18.7%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57%	35,846	12.8%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08%	4,255	22.2%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93%	8,257	23.7%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42%	33,151	24.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74%	24,747	21.2%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.30%	4,426	12.2%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67%	1,278	35.3%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12%	1,983	19.7%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.84%	6,845	60.6%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.32%	397	41.0%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.97%	14,105	19.0%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.36%	222	66.7%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.52%	75,632	22.3%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.28%	22,814	18.9%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73%	2,797	15.4%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.07%	2,129	44.4%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.96%	1,173	28.6%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04%	285	50.0%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.79%	47,142	26.3%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.40%	5,310	9.9%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.81%	6,679	73.5%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.42%	6,057	66.6%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.75%	1,014	33.3%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.15%	2,243	100.0%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.60%	3,199	14.3%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.63%	5,226	32.9%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.27%	1,763	100.0%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.26%	3,446	37.8%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.66%	1,284	100.0%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.77%	4,635	41.5%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.24%	638	100.0%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.55%	998	41.7%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.94%	1,479	98.3%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.15%	534	40.0%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.73%	440	42.9%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.18%	1,021	100.0%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.54%	1,210	16.0%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.16%	1,155	16.7%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.58%	209	66.7%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.17%	1,621	16.7%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.50%	286	100.0%
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.15%	2,195	13.3%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.83%	3,410	7.3%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.30%	3,509	14.2%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.86%	295	100.0%
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.13%	5,389	9.1%
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.11%	5,815	38.9%
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.21%	3,905	100.0%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.58%	574	66.7%
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.20%	912	50.0%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.38%	146	25.0%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.30%	362	100.0%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.99%	2,009	15.0%
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23%	3,516	51.8%
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.90%	1,256	45.8%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.93%	626	100.0%
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.61%	155	100.0%
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.82%	1,255	50.0%
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.64%	2,274	20.8%
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.79%	280	100.0%
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.10%	262	15.4%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.87%	470	50.0%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.26%	233	100.0%
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.47%	3,629	79.0%
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.80%	7,394	28.3%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.39%	410	75.0%
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30%	2,572	62.7%
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.74%	1,396	23.1%
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.74%	2,843	32.0%
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.38%	990	100.0%
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.92%	343	100.0%
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30%	355	100.0%
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.54%	1,157	6.4%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.22%	409	70.0%
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.85%	1,903	28.7%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.28%	661	100.0%
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.47%	1,256	73.7%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.44%	593	100.0%
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.40%	500	81.2%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.83%	1,042	63.6%
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.90%	477	100.0%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	351	100.0%

Sioux Single Father Poverty

COMPARE

Sioux Single Father PovertyTragic

Sioux Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Sioux by Single Father Poverty

Sioux Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Sioux Single Father Poverty
Tragic