Shoshone vs Alsatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Shoshone
Alsatian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Shoshone
Alsatians
18.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Alsatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,320,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,194,745 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 1.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Alsatian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 48.4% |
Range | 47.5% | 46.3% |
Mean | 21.8% | 21.1% |
Median | 18.9% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.0% | 25.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Alsatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |