Immigrants from Laos Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Disability Age Over 75
Immigrants from Laos Disability Age Over 75
49.2%
DISABILITY | AGE OVER 75
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,421,107 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247 and weighted average of 49.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.86% in percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Hawaiian (49.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (49.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Dominica (49.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (49.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Iraq (49.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 49.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.2 /100 | #272 | Tragic 49.1% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 49.1% |
Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 49.1% |
Immigrants from Dominica | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 49.1% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 49.2% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 49.2% |
Immigrants from Laos | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 49.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 49.4% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 49.4% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 49.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 49.5% |
Samoans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 49.5% |
Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 49.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 49.6% |
Immigrants from Laos Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Disability Age Over 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.032% | 15.9% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 82.4% |
Range | 16.5% | 66.5% |
Mean | 3.9% | 49.0% |
Median | 3.2% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 53.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 10.9% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age Over 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 130,101,065 | 48.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 30,162,392 | 48.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,843,330 | 48.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 7,156,471 | 47.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,157,870 | 48.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,767,490 | 49.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,713,771 | 49.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,289,060 | 53.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,256,502 | 49.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 829,013 | 50.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 449,931 | 48.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,199,504 | 47.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 547,455 | 54.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 394,922 | 53.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,111,507 | 52.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 107,002 | 52.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 49.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 177,331 | 45.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 183,220 | 45.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 140,535 | 49.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 262,666 | 51.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 66,031 | 49.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 67,210 | 50.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 75,649 | 50.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 74,457 | 55.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 46.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 63,958 | 56.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 48.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 56,927 | 46.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 77,547 | 55.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 8,566 | 69.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 64.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,406 | 55.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 4,530 | 52.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 9,310 | 70.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 49.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 46.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 789 | 53.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 53.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 439 | 18.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 146,187 | 46.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 53.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 802 | 51.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 58.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 28.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 5,134 | 61.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 4,332 | 36.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 244 | 50.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 37.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 106 | 82.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 44.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 30.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 3,208 | 40.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 51.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 62.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 43 | 28.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 153 | 57.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.27% | 55 | 23.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 42.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 50.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 53.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 38.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 564 | 62.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 527 | 15.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.49% | 734 | 41.4% |