Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Chinese
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 14.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 34.9% | 25.9% |
| Range | 32.8% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 10.8% |
| Median | 9.3% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |