Colville vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Colville
Scottish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Colville
Scottish
22.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,561,813 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 544,607,690 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 46.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville | Scottish |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 92.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.4% | 97.9% |
| Mean | 36.0% | 38.1% |
| Median | 28.6% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 52.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 37.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 30.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 30.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Colville by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |