Colville vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Colville
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Colville
Chileans
22.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,561,813 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 49.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Chilean |
Minimum | 8.3% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 92.7% | 48.3% |
Range | 84.4% | 43.2% |
Mean | 36.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 28.6% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Colville by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |