Chickasaw vs Inupiat Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Inupiat
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Inupiat
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Inupiat Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,997,160 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
| Range | 90.0% | 72.3% |
| Mean | 31.9% | 34.3% |
| Median | 25.2% | 30.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 47.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 32.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 20.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Inupiat by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Cherokee (19.6%, a difference of 0.85%), Slovak (19.3%, a difference of 0.91%), Dutch West Indian (19.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (19.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 20.7% |