Immigrants from Philippines Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Immigrants from Philippines Single Father Poverty
14.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,572,614 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 14.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Filipino (14.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from India (14.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Korean (14.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Afghan (14.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (14.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants from Philippines Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 34.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.8% | 95.3% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 22.8% |
| Median | 11.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 23.1% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 228,080,227 | 17.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 59,999,135 | 15.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 20,907,684 | 14.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 12,271,201 | 13.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 11,029,348 | 14.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,303,978 | 10.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 7,163,207 | 10.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 2,927,041 | 12.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 2,498,374 | 14.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,368,443 | 12.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 510,407 | 8.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 1,226,014 | 11.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 773,560 | 13.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 554,868 | 15.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 406,648 | 8.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 790,901 | 12.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.16% | 704,719 | 23.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.63% | 117,060 | 16.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.26% | 197,854 | 25.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 6,867 | 26.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 135,025 | 15.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 45.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.33% | 66,487 | 10.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 262,638 | 13.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 340,410 | 9.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 112,463 | 5.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 23,950 | 30.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 177,640 | 12.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 12.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 43,460 | 19.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 1,462 | 63.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 17,604 | 18.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,052 | 7.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 4,506 | 23.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.22% | 4,628 | 50.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.84% | 12,906 | 13.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 58,735 | 5.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.95% | 17,828 | 13.4% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 23.00% | 3,961 | 68.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.00% | 626 | 100.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 7.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 5.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.55% | 1,372 | 100.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.63% | 98 | 75.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.99% | 39,873 | 4.7% |