Cajun Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Cajun
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Cajun Single Father Poverty
23.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,032,102 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 23.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.88% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cajuns and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cajuns influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Cajuns simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Shoshone (22.9%, a difference of 0.71%), Kiowa (22.5%, a difference of 2.7%), Native/Alaskan (22.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Sioux (23.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and Arapaho (24.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 28.5% |
Cajun Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.027% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 98.6% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 38.2% |
| Median | 3.4% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 55.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 30.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 30.0% |
Correlation Details
| Cajun Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.027% | 117,993,750 | 14.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 5,759,275 | 18.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 2,221,320 | 24.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 955,945 | 30.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 549,852 | 23.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 302,577 | 27.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 382,788 | 21.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 179,698 | 38.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 222,244 | 29.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 82,429 | 29.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 87,891 | 25.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 124,365 | 13.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 96,087 | 28.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 32,276 | 64.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 122,757 | 23.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 126,523 | 22.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 49,930 | 20.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 18,706 | 24.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 22,403 | 27.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 64,799 | 23.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 76,554 | 31.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 42,277 | 20.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 3,818 | 47.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 37,440 | 7.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 89,575 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 109,658 | 37.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 54,816 | 29.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 538 | 70.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 2,761 | 7.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 16,526 | 30.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 29,975 | 18.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 6,498 | 7.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 734 | 15.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 23,864 | 10.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 1,347 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 7,286 | 58.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 19,497 | 9.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 8,745 | 6.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.38% | 2,231 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 4,162 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 7,223 | 73.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 3,297 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 16,937 | 55.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 11,726 | 13.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 24,688 | 19.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,069 | 36.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 915 | 36.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 14,689 | 20.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 1,518 | 100.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.01% | 2,215 | 1.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.06% | 9,326 | 55.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.92% | 1,220 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.57% | 3,338 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 24 | 100.0% |