Czech Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Czech Single Father Poverty
17.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,801,462 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521 and weighted average of 17.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.9% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechs and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Czechs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Moroccan (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Finnish (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Bermudan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Subsaharan African (16.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Marshallese | 3.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 2.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 2.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Bermudans | 2.6 /100 | #239 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Finns | 2.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Czechs | 2.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Moroccans | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 1.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Hondurans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Greeks | 1.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 1.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 17.1% |
Czech Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 34.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 34.0% | 90.5% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 38.0% |
| Median | 9.4% | 24.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 36.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 28.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 28.2% |
Correlation Details
| Czech Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 223,348,383 | 16.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 82,949,624 | 15.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 24,060,804 | 16.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 11,632,917 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 5,998,267 | 15.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 3,524,885 | 17.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 1,983,223 | 16.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 1,099,761 | 17.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 621,219 | 20.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 501,968 | 18.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 891,761 | 15.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 326,333 | 22.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 185,820 | 18.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 471,550 | 13.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 358,489 | 21.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 253,126 | 20.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 129,972 | 15.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 135,631 | 20.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 6,900 | 36.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 20,699 | 49.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.25% | 30,256 | 13.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 34,348 | 21.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.88% | 20,096 | 24.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 16,720 | 64.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 20,132 | 29.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.87% | 1,791 | 59.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 18,017 | 29.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 17,660 | 28.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.73% | 6,686 | 72.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.14% | 3,699 | 22.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 9,380 | 9.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,174 | 51.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.95% | 11,476 | 49.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.39% | 7,369 | 21.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.61% | 1,829 | 35.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.83% | 277 | 25.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 2,858 | 54.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.52% | 1,919 | 23.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.13% | 940 | 100.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.65% | 490 | 50.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.08% | 780 | 53.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.89% | 36 | 100.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.97% | 23,233 | 19.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 2,820 | 61.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 5,031 | 10.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.08% | 6,923 | 21.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.57% | 13,467 | 30.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.43% | 986 | 10.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.98% | 159 | 100.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.42% | 264 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 5,067 | 29.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.07% | 215 | 100.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.50% | 6,576 | 10.5% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.97% | 515 | 28.6% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.66% | 2,105 | 11.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.99% | 191 | 100.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.11% | 965 | 76.9% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.55% | 7,991 | 57.8% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.52% | 6,315 | 72.2% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.50% | 254 | 33.3% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.17% | 120 | 100.0% |