Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Father Poverty
16.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,577,503 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 16.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 6.7% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Zimbabwe influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Immigrants from Zimbabwe simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Israel (16.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (16.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and South African (16.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants from Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants from France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants from Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |
Portuguese | 62.3 /100 | #158 | Good 16.2% |
Belizeans | 59.9 /100 | #159 | Average 16.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.016% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 5.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 5.4% | 98.2% |
Mean | 0.96% | 26.8% |
Median | 0.63% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.29% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.1% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.77% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 24.9% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.016% | 90,044,787 | 14.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 9,065,913 | 14.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 2,554,242 | 15.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 1,664,939 | 13.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 701,149 | 18.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 356,696 | 33.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 344,813 | 15.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 223,880 | 22.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 246,787 | 13.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 24,333 | 11.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 136,265 | 35.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 39,523 | 5.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 38,459 | 19.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 9,712 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 52,445 | 1.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 29,545 | 23.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 1,596 | 26.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 25,785 | 37.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 1,824 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 13,247 | 30.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 197 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 1,366 | 25.0% |