Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Black/African American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,509,079 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.206% in Blacks/African Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 205.7 Blacks/African Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $73,370, a difference of 60.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $78,556, a difference of 55.6%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $67,573, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $44,381, a difference of 28.7%), and median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $35,315, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 90.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 86.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 63.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 76.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 76.4%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 105.4%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 93.0%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 67.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.8%).