Immigrants from Denmark vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,887,093 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.428% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 428.4 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $40,244, a difference of 33.7%), median family income ($120,445 compared to $92,872, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,000 compared to $89,811, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $48,977, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $36,920, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (62.9% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.0%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.7%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 70.9%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 15.9%).