Mexican American Indian vs French American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
French American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
French American Indians
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs French American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,954,359 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 2.4%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | French American Indian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 35.9% | 36.3% |
Range | 33.3% | 32.2% |
Mean | 15.1% | 13.8% |
Median | 13.8% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and French American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |