Immigrants from Barbados vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,134,497 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to an increase of 62.0 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 42.2%), median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $36,920, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,163 compared to $48,977, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,795 compared to $50,611, a difference of 0.36%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $89,811, a difference of 0.47%), and median family income ($92,419 compared to $92,872, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 37.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.5%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple households (39.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.54%), family households (63.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 183.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 89.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 27.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 71.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.7%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.92%).