Immigrants from England vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,016,510 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 29.8 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $89,811, a difference of 21.9%), per capita income ($48,844 compared to $40,244, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($112,038 compared to $92,872, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $48,977, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $36,920, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.8%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 7.8%).