Immigrants from Oceania vs Choctaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Choctaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Choctaw
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Choctaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,627,638 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 43.9% |
| Maximum | 91.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.6% | 56.1% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 66.7% |
| Median | 67.1% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 62.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 68.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Ecuadorian (65.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |