Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ghanaian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Ghanaians
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,052,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 6.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.8% |
Range | 96.2% | 40.7% |
Mean | 26.8% | 16.7% |
Median | 21.7% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 20.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |