Austrian vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,239,168 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.663% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 662.6 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $39,372, a difference of 22.2%), wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and median family income ($111,306 compared to $92,231, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $53,275, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $36,904, a difference of 10.9%), and median household income ($91,339 compared to $79,737, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 55.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 4.0%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.2%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.36, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.81%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 78.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.5%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%).