Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,748,734 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 37.0 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $55,582, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $112,010, a difference of 15.2%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $65,406, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $53,621, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $44,774, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.64%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.95%).