Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,949,585 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to an increase of 96.9 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $61,988, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $39,871, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,197 compared to $103,534, a difference of 0.33%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,849 compared to $97,329, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $103,173, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.2%), births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 132.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 76.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 61.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.8%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.48%).