Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,230,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 23.2 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,685, a difference of 18.5%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $83,468, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $93,665, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,230, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $59,656, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 29.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 11th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%).