Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,727,298 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.884. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.863% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 862.6 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,523, a difference of 5.5%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $67,926, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $114,220, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($51,770 compared to $51,875, a difference of 0.20%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $107,269, a difference of 0.36%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $95,930, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.28%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%).