Luxembourger vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Bahamians

Excellent
Tragic
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,150,559 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.913. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.281% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 280.7 Bahamians.
Luxembourger Integration in Bahamian Communities

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 35.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $75,395, a difference of 29.0%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $82,631, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $45,743, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $35,125, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $51,000, a difference of 19.5%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.2%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 86.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 70.7%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
17.0%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 30.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.5%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 38.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.28, a difference of 5.6%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
40.8%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 84.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.3%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.1%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Luxembourger vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerBahamian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%