Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,992,816 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 48.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Spanish American Indian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	6.4%	1.1%
Maximum	57.8%	24.4%
Range	51.4%	23.3%
Mean	22.2%	12.0%
Median	18.8%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.5%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	25.3%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.8%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.9%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.7%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 20.0%
Bangladeshis	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 20.1%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%