Inupiat vs Immigrants from Central America Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants from Central America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants from Central America
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Central America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,314,579 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,791,715 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 3.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants from Central America |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.9% | 93.3% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 26.7% |
| Median | 17.7% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.7% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Immigrants from Central America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belize (16.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.74%), Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (16.4%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |