Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bangladeshi
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chickasaw
Bangladeshis
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,729,923 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 34.4%, a difference of 5.5%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 5.6% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.1% |
Range | 94.4% | 51.5% |
Mean | 53.6% | 36.4% |
Median | 47.0% | 35.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.0% | 30.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 42.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.3% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are French Canadian (34.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (34.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Native Hawaiian (34.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Ghana (34.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Ghanaian (34.3%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Delaware | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 34.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 34.2% |
Panamanians | 3.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 34.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 34.2% |
Ghanaians | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 34.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 34.3% |
French Canadians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 34.4% |
Bangladeshis | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 34.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 34.7% |
Marshallese | 1.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 34.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 34.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 34.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 34.9% |