Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bhutanese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chickasaw
Bhutanese
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,866,190 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 27.9%, a difference of 30.2%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 5.6% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.4% | 94.5% |
Mean | 53.6% | 33.6% |
Median | 47.0% | 30.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.0% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 39.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 19.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.3% | 21.0% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Romania (27.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Afghan (27.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Mongolian (27.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Maltese (27.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 27.7% |
Hmong | 99.5 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 27.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Maltese | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.4 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Afghans | 99.4 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Mongolians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 28.1% |