Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Sierra Leonean
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chickasaw
Sierra Leoneans
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,118,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 34.9%, a difference of 4.1%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.4% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 53.6% | 37.0% |
| Median | 47.0% | 32.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.0% | 25.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 18.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.3% | 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Sierra Leoneans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Salvadoran (36.0%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Cambodia (34.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (34.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Marshallese (34.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guyana (35.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Indonesian (35.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Marshallese | 1.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 34.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 34.9% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 1.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 35.0% |
| Indonesians | 1.2 /100 | #242 | Tragic 35.0% |
| Japanese | 0.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 35.2% |
| Guyanese | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 35.2% |
| Shoshone | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 35.3% |
| Nigerians | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 35.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 35.4% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |