Ugandan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ugandan
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Ugandan Births to Unmarried Women
30.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,593,945 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 30.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.8% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ugandans and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ugandans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Ugandans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Korean (30.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Argentina (30.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Argentinean (30.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Scandinavians | 92.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 92.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Ethiopians | 91.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 91.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 91.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
Ugandan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.016% | 8.7% |
| Maximum | 4.6% | 53.4% |
| Range | 4.6% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 1.2% | 28.2% |
| Median | 0.90% | 28.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.44% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.3% | 36.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.91% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 10.9% |
Correlation Details
| Ugandan Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.016% | 80,845,394 | 34.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 6,004,981 | 28.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 2,184,332 | 27.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 1,239,264 | 37.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 535,447 | 33.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 540,310 | 29.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.50% | 230,135 | 25.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 173,140 | 19.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 235,289 | 28.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 114,417 | 41.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 97,846 | 8.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 37,935 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 23,738 | 19.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 14,073 | 53.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 154,908 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 27,137 | 41.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 13,516 | 36.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 44,893 | 29.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 14,202 | 17.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 9,019 | 46.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 15,830 | 20.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 11,455 | 13.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 26,684 | 16.9% |