Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,726,329 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331 and weighted average of 33.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.54% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants from Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
| Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
| Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
| French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
| Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.099% | 12.5% |
| Maximum | 35.8% | 68.3% |
| Range | 35.7% | 55.8% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 35.1% |
| Median | 7.7% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 40.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 11.3% |
Correlation Details
| Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.099% | 216,182,759 | 32.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 32,098,757 | 31.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 16,700,567 | 33.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,291,181 | 31.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,310,608 | 33.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,617,007 | 36.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,723,665 | 32.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 9,977,704 | 31.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,747,008 | 34.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 994,656 | 38.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 904,318 | 38.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 633,882 | 32.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 255,104 | 27.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 201,886 | 43.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 350,415 | 27.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 265,246 | 37.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 66,410 | 24.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 290,655 | 31.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 83,207 | 47.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 74,976 | 40.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 124,037 | 13.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 92,812 | 25.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 195,744 | 36.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.96% | 100,875 | 30.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 216,267 | 35.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 181,924 | 46.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 32.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 104,421 | 38.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 138,563 | 32.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 329,290 | 47.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.08% | 27,794 | 12.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 50.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 50,351 | 22.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 216,830 | 25.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 28.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 42.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,456 | 23.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.48% | 13,154 | 32.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 21.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.89% | 105,521 | 26.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 21.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 6,411 | 53.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 105,759 | 18.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,070 | 44.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 41,907 | 65.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.88% | 27,076 | 23.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 11,777 | 68.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 39.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 36.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 40.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 45.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 56.3% |