Arapaho Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Arapaho
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Arapaho Births to Unmarried Women
47.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,148,677 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 47.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.36% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arapaho and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arapaho influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Arapaho simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arapaho by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Houma (46.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (48.2%, a difference of 2.3%), Puerto Rican (45.7%, a difference of 3.2%), Colville (45.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and Tohono O'odham (49.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 47.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 48.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 49.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 50.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 51.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 51.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 51.5% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 52.1% |
Arapaho Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 13.4% |
| Maximum | 77.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 77.1% | 86.6% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 71.4% |
| Median | 4.5% | 78.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 47.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 52.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 30.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 29.4% |
Correlation Details
| Arapaho Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 28,841,155 | 33.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 130,178 | 47.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 95,103 | 47.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 13,053 | 80.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 3,367 | 73.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 1,021 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 3,662 | 87.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 588 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 574 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 8,010 | 13.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 993 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 10,733 | 47.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 283 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.48% | 3,122 | 62.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 18,898 | 43.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.18% | 13,248 | 17.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.23% | 513 | 100.0% |
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.72% | 1,596 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.24% | 1,471 | 76.9% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.10% | 1,109 | 100.0% |