Chickasaw vs Central American Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Central American
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chickasaw
Central Americans
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Central American Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,543,910 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 36.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Central American |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 18.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.4% | 81.9% |
| Mean | 53.6% | 41.3% |
| Median | 47.0% | 39.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 44.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.3% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Central Americans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Comanche (36.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (36.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Cherokee (36.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Senegalese (36.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Subsaharan African (36.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 36.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 36.8% |