Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Spaniard
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Spaniards

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,805
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
210th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Spaniard Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,626,655 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Spaniards within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.109% in Spaniards. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 108.8 Spaniards.
Zimbabwean Integration in Spaniard Communities

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $101,617, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,866, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $84,644, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,117, a difference of 0.28%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $54,401, a difference of 3.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Fair
$43,028
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Fair
$101,617
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Average
$84,644
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Fair
$46,059
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Average
$54,401
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Poor
$38,656
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$51,117
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Fair
$93,366
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Average
$99,889
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Average
$60,866
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.0%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.37%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
9.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Poor
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
17.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
11.9%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.6%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
81.5%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
33.6%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.1%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Fair
85.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Average
65.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Fair
59.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Spaniard Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSpaniard
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%