U.S. Virgin Islander vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,512,100 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.179% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 178.7 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $55,573, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($37,589 compared to $34,195, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $33,625, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,294 compared to $85,728, a difference of 0.51%), householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $53,077, a difference of 1.9%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.90%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.2%), single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.8%), currently married (40.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 132.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 75.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.9%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%).