South American Indian vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,592,147 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 92.1 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $54,866, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $63,944, a difference of 17.3%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $120,726, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,528, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $43,996, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $69,343, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.5%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%).