Navajo vs Osage Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Navajo
Osage
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Navajo
Osage
4.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Osage Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,724,902 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,798,863 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 13.2%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Osage |
Minimum | 0.66% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 16.5% |
Range | 22.6% | 14.2% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.7% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Osage by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Apache (4.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Seminole (4.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Lumbee (4.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 4.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |