Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Kuwait Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,090,370 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,192,954 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 2.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Native Hawaiian	Immigrants from Kuwait
Minimum	2.4%	1.4%
Maximum	70.0%	70.8%
Range	67.6%	69.4%
Mean	17.7%	18.9%
Median	13.3%	15.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.7%	11.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.1%	22.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.4%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.3%	13.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.2%	13.2%

Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Immigrants from Kuwait by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.050%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Spain	89.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Czechoslovakians	89.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Native Hawaiians	89.0 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
South Africans	88.7 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	88.2 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.5%
Armenians	87.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.5%
New Zealanders	87.2 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Jordan	87.2 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.6%
Canadians	87.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Peru	86.6 /100 \| #143	Excellent 15.6%
Israelis	86.3 /100 \| #144	Excellent 15.6%
Welsh	85.4 /100 \| #145	Excellent 15.6%
Samoans	84.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 15.7%
Slavs	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 15.7%
Icelanders	82.4 /100 \| #148	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	80.9 /100 \| #149	Excellent 15.8%
Immigrants \| Albania	80.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent 15.8%
Venezuelans	80.1 /100 \| #151	Excellent 15.8%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	79.4 /100 \| #152	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	78.5 /100 \| #153	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%